From: Ian Bruntlett (Ian.Bruntlett_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-03-30 03:42:31
> > Thank you, that's a good idea. For a smart resource, I'd prefer a
> > name to "is_null" - its got a definite "pointer" tone to it.
> How about is_nill?? What than?
I've asked around. The best suggestion is "is_null".
> > > Also, you are also repeatedly ignoring the fact that you
> > > won't work one the compiler can't tell one resource from another
> > > there are both represented by an integer!
> > Sorry, I thought I'd already acknowledged that in a previous reply.
> So you agree that specialation will not always work?
Yes, I agree that specialisation will not always work.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk