From: Kevin Atkinson (kevinatk_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-04-25 10:01:20
On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, Kevin Atkinson wrote:
> > SMALL_VAL can generally be fixed based on the type.
> I take that back. After thinking about it it would depond on the relative
> magnitude of what is being compared. I guess you code would be the best
> thing to do although couldn't the equal case be defined something like
> rhs.inf() == lhs.inf()
> lhs.sup() == lhs.sup()
> Which will only involve 3 operations.
> Another thing to do is to scale the values based on the exponent of either
> rhs or lhs. However if the computer does not see this as a mere exponent
> change the performance results could be disastrous.
> It seams like safe comparison should really be an operation of the
-- Kevin Atkinson kevinatk_at_[hidden] http://metalab.unc.edu/kevina/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk