From: Jens Maurer (jmaurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-04-25 16:26:38
At the request of Beman, I've now tested the random numbers
library with the free command-line compiler Borland C++ v5.5
and with MSVC 5.0sp3. As expected, MSVC 5.0sp3 fails all over.
However, Borland C++ isn't much better. In particular,
BCC seems to dislike boost/operators.hpp and the "derive
from template instantiated with the deriving class"
technique used there. I've confirmed that boost/rational.hpp
doesn't compile with BCC either. Did I miss any
non-obvious command-line switches?
Anyway, I've put an #error in random.hpp to prevent
compilation with BCC, and I suggest doing the same in
boost/operators.hpp until someone comes up with a work-around.
I have put up an updated random library in the boost vault
which also hopefully fixes the problems Beman noted to me
in a private e-mail regarding MSVC6 and Metrowerks troubles.
Since I don't have access to any other compilers in the
foreseeable future, I shall leave it at that until someone
confirms that the code in the vault works with at least
MSVC6 or any other popular compiler except gcc 2.95.x.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk