From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-10 10:45:52
> It seems to me that it just too confusing for users if boost has
> alternate interfaces to the same underlying functionality, except in
> exceptional circumstances. Normally, boost should just pick one of
> the alternates and stick with it.
Yes, but what I was asking, in effect, was: Should I submit an expression
template library that, well, is a direct competitor to the "lambda" and the
"functors" libraries already in the vault, both interface- and
Boost hasn't (formally) picked anything yet in the ET department.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk