From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-05-31 00:13:48
From: Dave Abrahams <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> on 5/30/00 8:27 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu at andrewalex_at_[hidden] wrote:
> > 1. There's no way of combining them. Basically I have proved to
> > myself that there are few ways of combining behaviors at design time,
> > aside from using policy classes, and policy classes are the best way.
> > 2. There's no way of configuring/tweaking them. Each app has some
> > specific needs, and I think anyone would acknowledge this. Just how
> > many times you said "Ah, I'd love to use BrainyPtr but I use COM and
> > BrainyPtr doesn't support COM"? With SmartPtr, adding COM support is
> > as easy as writing 15 lines of code.
> Having just written another specialized smart pointer for my Python stuff
> (and a pretty lame one at that), I find Andrei's arguments compelling. I am
> very interested to see what he has come up with in this department.
As am I, having struggled with the possibilities for years.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk