From: Branko Èibej (branko.cibej_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-01 01:19:49
Thomas Matelich wrote:
> I'm not catching the usage of ordering. Is it necessary for when you have
> two active singletons? Ahh... now I see. The order in which you create
> the ordering objects (remembering to keep related ordering objects in one
> file) is the order in which the are destroyed? Is that right?
BTW, I'm working on enhancing that interface so that a singleton's
lifetime can be bound to a lexical scope or other object's lifetime.
Any day now ...
-- Branko Èibej <branko.cibej_at_[hidden]> HERMES SoftLab, Litijska 51, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia voice: (+386 1) 586 53 49 fax: (+386 1) 586 52 70
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk