From: Howard Hinnant (hinnant_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-01 15:41:42
Dave Abrahams wrote on 6/1/2000 4:31 PM
>--- In boost_at_[hidden], Beman Dawes <beman_at_e...> wrote:
>> Kevlin isn't the only one suggesting just using the <*.h> C headers.
>> The first time I heard it, I was horrified. But given how messy the
>> problem has become, the <*.h> C headers don't looks so bad after
>One major downside to that course is that some implementations cause
>the equivalent of "using namespace std;" if you #include even _one_
FWIW, as of Pro 6, CodeWarrior will no longer be in the set of
implementations which Dave refers to.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk