Re: [boost] Re: reverse_iterator.hpp uploaded

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-14 11:09:08

David Abrahams writes:
 > Sheesh. No offense, but that sounds more complicated than it's worth.
 > If someone needs extended categorization they can define an
 > extended_iterator_tag, no?

If I understand what you mean, that's what I'm trying to
accommodate... the "my_iterator_tag" was one of these extended
categories, and I need too be able to figure out which of the standard
categories is its base class, so I can pick the right adaptor class
for it.

I agree, things are getting a bit complicated :) I've got some ideas
for how to simplify the code...

Cheers,

Jeremy