Re: [boost] Re: Testing with various compilers [was operators.hpp ...]

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-06-21 13:24:27

When the C++ implementation does not have a <limits> header, I usually
supply my own instead. I suppose we could have a boost/limits.hpp that
can serve as a replacement.

Beman Dawes writes:
 > At 05:25 PM 6/21/2000 +0000, Jorg Schaible wrote:
 > 
 >  >Shoudn't this be either <limits.h> or <climits> ??
 > 
 > No, I was looking for the C++ standard library header <limits> (see 18.2.1 
 > [lib.limits]).  Needed for the numeric_limits<> template.
 > 
 > --Beman
 > 
 > 
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > SALESFORCE.COM MAKES SOFTWARE OBSOLETE
 > Secure, online sales force automation with 5 users FREE for 1 year!
 > http://click.egroups.com/1/2658/4/_/9351/_/961611404/
 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
 > 
 > 
 >