Re: [boost] random and detail namespace

From: Matthias Troyer (troyer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-28 12:24:27

Ian Bruntlett wrote:
> 
> > Dave Abrahams wrote:
> >  >I just happened to take a look at the docs for the random library,
> >  >and the fact that we are documenting things we're putting in the
> >  >detail namespace hit me like a cold slap in the face ;\
> >  >
> >  >I thought detail was supposed to be reserved for implementation
> >  >details of no interest to users...?
> 
> Surely its of interest to people porting the library?

A I see it the templated classes for RNGs in the
detail namespace are of interest to people 
implementing additional RNGs, but not to people
just using the library. A documentation thus
seems to be appropriate, but maybe we can have it
separated from the rest of the documentation?

Matthias Troyer