Re: [boost] random and detail namespace

From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-28 22:07:20

From: "Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]>

> Perhaps those classes should go in boost::additional_rng instead of
> boost::detail?  This seems analgous to private and protected specifiers
> for classes.

It looks to me like the classes in detail should go in boost::random. We
could put everything in boost::random and bring the non-detail stuff into
boost with using-declarations. I hear Beman had some objections to this in
private email, but don't know what they may have been.

-Dave