From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-06-28 22:07:20
From: "Howard Hinnant" <hinnant_at_[hidden]>
> Perhaps those classes should go in boost::additional_rng instead of
> boost::detail? This seems analgous to private and protected specifiers
> for classes.
It looks to me like the classes in detail should go in boost::random. We
could put everything in boost::random and bring the non-detail stuff into
boost with using-declarations. I hear Beman had some objections to this in
private email, but don't know what they may have been.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk