From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-16 08:18:01
----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul A. Bristow" <pbristow_at_[hidden]>
> I like the boost process - it catches mistypes
> > Shouldn't the value type be 'T' and not hard-wired 'double'? Yes, of
> and comes up with excellent suggestions!
> When I get back from holiday, I will try to post a first draft,
> using this proposal.
> Unless there are other suggestions?
> Or are there contrary views on the possible costs of this?
> Do current compilers handle this efficienctly enough?
Speaking of efficiency, you'd probably do well to leave off the
exception-specifications. That will result in a pessimization on many
compilers. Since the functions are inline, most compilers will be able to
deduce that they can't throw anyway.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk