Boost logo

Boost :

From: jsiek_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-07-24 20:01:56

Isn't branching the solution to this problem?

Also, we should have a convention for tag names for
boost releases/branches/etc.

For the main line, how about:
  boost-1-16-1 (for the current release 1.16.1)

For branches, how about use the name of the new library:

This also has the advantage that changes needed to common
files like config.hpp can be made and the revision history
will be appropriately recorded.



David Abrahams writes:
> The problem:
> How to allow development of new, as-yet-unaccepted libraries without
> "infecting" the main CVS release trunk.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at