Date: 2000-07-24 20:01:56
Isn't branching the solution to this problem?
Also, we should have a convention for tag names for
For the main line, how about:
boost-1-16-1 (for the current release 1.16.1)
For branches, how about use the name of the new library:
This also has the advantage that changes needed to common
files like config.hpp can be made and the revision history
will be appropriately recorded.
David Abrahams writes:
> The problem:
> How to allow development of new, as-yet-unaccepted libraries without
> "infecting" the main CVS release trunk.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk