Re: [boost] Re: compile time asserts [preconditions]

From: Nathan Myers (ncm_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-07-31 16:48:43

On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 09:34:13PM +0100, Andy Sawyer wrote:
> On 31 July 2000 20:29, Mark Rodgers wrote:
> > From: "David Abrahams" <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> > > all work, with BOOST_STATIC_ASSERT being my favourite so far.
> > 
> > And mine.  It inherits the well known meaning of "assert", and adds
> > that the assertion occurs at compile time.
> 
> Not to mention the fact that it adds another meaning to the
> little-used concept of "static" :-)))

I see the smileys, but ... this use really harks back to the original 
definition of "static", before it got overloaded with the various
abuses.

Nathan Myers
ncm at cantrip dot org