Re: [boost] Re: stlport was[formatting manipulator]

From: Levente Farkas (lfarkas_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-22 03:48:26

Thomas Matelich wrote:
> 
> David Abrahams wrote:
> 
> > I'm sure you know, but you can get a (much more) conforming library...
> > www.stlport.org
> 
> I'm curious, is it just me or is stlport very crash prone (at least on Linux).
> I was all excited about the prospect of standard compliant library but once I
> got everything ported it crashed.  I just wanted to know if people are using
> this on real projects successfully.

we use it and after a few bug fix with boris it works correctly (at least the
final 4.0), but with the latest gcc snapshot. anyway gcc's libstdc++-v3 seems
to better candidate, but it need some time (although we already use that too).

 -- Levente                           http://petition.eurolinux.org/index_html
 "The only thing worse than not knowing the truth is
  ruining the bliss of ignorance."