Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-25 16:07:12

Next message: Daryle Walker: "[Style] Defining inline functions in header"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] low-level sub-allocation/alignment challenge"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "lexical_cast [was Regular Expression Library]"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] lexical_cast"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] lexical_cast"

Beman Dawes wrote:
> Should we combine the boost/lexical_cast.hpp and boost/cast.hpp
> headers?

I don't think so, because lexical_cast.hpp requires the rather
heavy-weight <sstream> header, while the current cast.hpp doesn't.

Reducing coupling is good.

Jens Maurer

Next message: Daryle Walker: "[Style] Defining inline functions in header"
Previous message: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] low-level sub-allocation/alignment challenge"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "lexical_cast [was Regular Expression Library]"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] lexical_cast"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] lexical_cast"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk