|
|
Boost : |
From: Bill Wade (bill.wade_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-08-31 15:05:29
> From: William Kempf [mailto:sirwillard_at_[hidden]]
> I'm not
> at all sure that any of this applies to the discussion of a portable
> atomic_t though.
I admit we got bogged down in trivia. I think the main point is to provide
an atomic counter that has enough features to be useful, but not so many
features that it won't be fast.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk