From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-01 03:39:34
In message <024b01c013ac$27171260$37781990_at_[hidden]>, Greg Colvin
>From: Daryle Walker <darylew_at_[hidden]>
>> Doesn't C ,and therefore C++, have a "sig_atomic_t" type that works like
>> this? (I mentioned this type during the thread discussions.) Could we use
>> it somehow, without (always) resorting to platform-specific extensions?
>In a word, no. The C and C++ standards promise very little
>(some would argue nothing) of any real use about sig_atomic_t.
And the only things they do "promise" are related to signals, not to
threading. Introducing a dependency on <csignal> would be misleading
(threads and signals interact _badly_) and incorrect :-}
Kevlin Henney phone: +44 117 942 2990
Curbralan Ltd mobile: +44 7801 073 508
kevlin_at_[hidden] fax: +44 870 052 2289
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk