Re: operators doc

From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-12 00:06:57

on 9/11/00 5:19 AM, David Abrahams at abrahams_at_[hidden] wrote:

> It really isn't relevant except to nonconforming compilers, but since we are
> trying to accomodate those, I suppose we should fix the documentation.
> 
> I want to see if Daryle Walker is interested in responding to my comments on
> his improvements to operators.hpp. If so, I'll ask him to fold in this
> change to whatever he does to the docs. If not, we'll just make the fix
> ourselves.

I can get around to making that change.

> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <alexy_at_[hidden]>
> Sent: Monday, September 11, 2000 4:20 AM
> 
>> I've just found a little inconsistence in our 'operators' library's
>> documentation: the example of explicit instantiation of operator templates
>> uses the 'class' keyword
>> 
>> |    class myclass // lose the inheritance...
>> |    {
>> |        //...
>> |    };
>> |    // explicitly instantiate the operators I need.
>> |    template class less_than_comparable<myclass>;
>> |    template class equality_comparable<myclass>;
>> //...
>> 
>> and we switched to 'struct' some time ago.

--