From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-14 06:39:16
>but YIKES! it copies the library right into my vc6 installation! Am I
>to be surprised, even worried?
In any case that old batch file based build is now dead - I have some
makefiles working which behave in a manner similar to the STLPort makefiles
(separate sub-directory builds + separate optional install step).
>Then, there are some warnings I get from vc6. It's just wrong in most
>but here are the fixes:
OK, cute, thanks.
>First, a remark on the code: it's full of long functions with many levels
>nesting and many switch statements. I recognize that regular language
>interpreters are a special breed, but this reminds me of the bad-old-days
>'C' programming, before I learned to break things down into digestible
>pieces. I find the "big monolithic function" style of programming leads to
>maintainance and readability problems. Does it have to be this way?
Whenever I get a chance I try and refactor that section, but the regex
syntax is so convoluted that its not easy to do without passing tons of
parameters down the stack.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk