Boost logo

Boost :

From: jeremy siek (jsiek_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-19 23:38:30

David Abrahams writes:
> >
> > get(edge_capacity(), G, e);
> That looks pretty good.

Since we've got the above free function, how about we have some
consistency and replace the following:

> edge_capacity::map(G)


  map(edge_capacity(), G)

or since that will probably cause name conflicts:

  get_map(edge_capacity(), G)

> Mmm... Seems kind of arbitrary. Are we introducing a new concept, the
> "edge_map"? I guess if you could get the metaprogramming right I'd rather
> see:
> property_map<Graph, edge_capacity>::type

Yeah, I bet I could manage this.



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at