From: William Kempf (sirwillard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-09-20 14:52:12
--- In boost_at_[hidden], Daryle Walker <darylew_at_m...> wrote:
> The file "bitint.zip," my first independent contribution, was
> the Boost vault. It should work like a lot of built-in unsigned
> implementations do: two-complement handling of a binary
> Operations work like they did in computer science classes (or at
> the best I can remember or make up). They can support arbitrary
> a template type based on the size, so the size is per type, not per
> The documentation was done similar to the rational<> docs.
Nice. My binary algebra is more than a little rusty, so I won't
comment too much on the mathematics. I do have a few comments in
boost::unsigned_char_bitint and cousins are pointless and shouldn't
exist. They're fine as typedefs within your test harness, but there
is no reason to have them within the header. Why? Because the size
is implementation defined and the implementation will be slower than
the compiler implementation equivalents. In other words, no one will
ever use them in real code.
The real use of boost::bitint is in using specific bit sized integers
when they don't exist on specific platforms. In other words,
boost::bitint<64> would be a great candidate for int64_t on those
platforms that don't have a built in 64 bit integer. Yes, it'll be
slower on those platforms, but at least you can code to them using a
simple, portable interface!
I dislike the fact that bitint really only supports unsigned
integers. I'd rather see both a bitint and an unsigned_bitint, which
shouldn't be difficult to do.
Also, I'd *really* like to see the related class bigint (or some
other name), which is an arbitrarily sized integer type that scales
to larger sizes as needed. The bitint class is easier to deal with,
and will work for 90% of the cases where you need large integral
types, but those 10% cases would be nice to cater to as well. Along
these same lines we could use a bigfloat as well. This type might
use a fixed point representation and bigint in order to avoid the
normal binary to decimal conversion error.
You get the idea. There are a lot of different numeric types that
would be quite beneficial to have in the language. I really don't
know where you'd want to draw the line on which to include and which
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk