From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-03 06:47:46
>A couple of suggestions:
>1) You probably will want to retain something like the PointerShim class
Ahah! That one had been bothering me - I came up with a really cludgy
workaround yesterday (and have a couple of others still to try), but that
looks like a sound idea.
>2) Right now is_same<int, int&>, is_ptr<int*&> return true. This
>seems undesirable. Perhaps you might make use of the is_reference
>metafunction in the implementations of the misbehaving metafunctions.
>Of course the test suite could be augmented too.
Yes, good thinking.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk