From: Chris Little (cslittle_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-05 08:34:19
The most interest point of this discussion is that it highlights the
difference between command line and gui users.
I work on Mac OS and Windows. On both platforms the
unarchiving tools I use have options to expanding an archive into
a folder. If that isn't what I want to happen it takes seconds to
by dragging file around. I very rarely look at the contents of an
archive before expanding it unless that archive is huge.
In any case Dave decision to wrap the library with a folder in the
archive is a good default and easy for people to undo.
--- In boost_at_[hidden], "David Abrahams"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "William Kempf" <sirwillard_at_m...>
> > This option puts *ALL* the files into the directory extracted to,
> > which simply won't work. I can live with the zip containing a
> > directory name", I just don't agree that it's "anti-social
> > for an archive not to do this.
> <************ MODERATOR'S INTERJECTION **************>
> The argument is moot, though, because future releases of
> _will_ generate a top-level directory.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk