From: David Abrahams (abrahams_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-10 10:13:47
----- Original Message -----
From: "Prabhu Ramachandran" <prabhu_at_[hidden]>
> If you havent already looked at this (which I doubt) I think
> you should:
Yes, my thing should probably be on that list.
> BTW swig doesnt use perl at all, it is written in C++.
> I have a question. I have never been at the boost list (I am
> subscribed now). I wanted to know what exactly a review implies? Is
> it just a formalized discussion? Does it mean I can discuss any ideas
> related to py_cpp?? For instance, could I have mentioned the above
> url on the list?
Yes, yes, and yes. Please see
http://www.boost.org/more/submission_process.htm#Review for details.
> Looked at py_cpp in a bit more detail. It looks very good.
> >>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <abrahams_at_[hidden]> writes:
> David> The focus of this release was:
> David> 1. enabling all of the special member function names
> David> described at:
> David> ml except for those used for emulating numeric types.
> Great, but emulating numerical types are extremely important
> for folks like me. Say I have a matrix class and have the operators
> +, -, and * defined I surely would like to use it in a simlar fashion
> under python. That would be fantastic. Please consider this in the
It's not hard, really; just a bunch more typing. Do you want to add it? It's
If not, I'm sure we could get it enabled in the next few days.
> David> 3. Enabling the wrapping of overloaded member functions and
> David> constructors. This work was a collaboration with Ullrich
> David> Koethe. Thanks, Ullrich!
> Wow. I wonder how you guys actually did this. Really cool.
We control the attribute lookup/function calling/error reporting rules for
the ExtensionClass types, so we can do almost anything we want.
> Docs would be great!
Thank you for so generously understating the case.
> David> Ullrich has done some excellent work on reflecting C++
> David> inheritance hierarchies in Python; I hope we'll be able to
> David> release it very soon.
> Oh wow! So soon code will be generated automagically, cant
> wait... ;)
I didn't mean to imply that. I meant to imply that if you have exposed C++
classes Base and Derived, and a C++ function declared to take a Base&
parameter, you will be able to pass a Derived instance from Python.
> David> The formal review period at boost for this library has
> David> begun. I hope that if you are interested in this library
> David> you will join the boost mailing list at www.egroups.com and
> David> participate in the open-source feedback loop.
> Yes, I have joined. Dunno how much use I will be though.
Your feedback has already been valuable, thanks. Just make any further
comments to the list.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk