Boost logo

Boost :

From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-11 06:25:52


Yikes, my first reaction was "no way", but checking the standard I see that
you are correct. Trouble is none of the compilers that I routinely test
with (Borland C++ 5.51, VC6, and gcc2.9x (Be/Linix/BSD) seem to define
swprint that way, they all go for:

int swprintf(wchar_t * S, const wchar_t * format, ...);

which appears to be just plain wrong.

I'll try and think of a method not involving swprintf at all.

- John.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at