From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-14 12:51:17
From: David Abrahams <abrahams_at_[hidden]>
> ... I think it would be terribly useful
> for all kinds of C++ research to have a public-domain C++ parser with a
> Python interface. We could use it to implement preprocessors to test
> proposed language extensions, etc. But I'm /not/ promising that I'm going to
> get one!
The OpenC++ system that John just posted a link to looks to be a much
more convenient system for extending C++. It would appear to be more
powerful and as efficient as template metaprogramming, and easier to
use for both the author and the client of an extension.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk