From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-16 07:18:14
At 04:26 AM 10/16/2000 +0000, jbandela_at_[hidden] wrote:
>Are there any plans for using STLPort 4.0 as the alternate library
>for VC++ instead of 3.2.1 for the compiler tests?
Yes. Jens Maurer has already switched the Linux tests to use 4.0.
Later... OK, I've switched the Windows 2000 test to use 4.0. The CVS has
Some problem with __STL_IMPORT_VENDOR_CSTD / BOOST_NO_STDC_NAMESPACE caused
several previously working tests to fail. A fix would be appreciated from
any STLport experts out there.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk