|
|
Boost : |
From: Moore, Paul (paul.moore_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-19 05:22:54
Given that I started the whole thread on the appropriateness of py_cpp for
boost, I feel that I should now say that the resulting discussions, and my
own further thinking on the matter, has left me feeling that I have no
objection to py_cpp becoming part of boost.
Paul.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk