Date: 2000-10-19 10:48:26
> If that is the only problem, then it is indeed not specific to member
> templates at all. But please, can someone recall the /specific/ objection
> which resulted in our not enabling member templates for
> smart_ptr.hpp with MSVC?
Here's some messages from the thread "MSVC template weirdness" (these deal
with template issues of several kinds with MSVC -- not just member
However, in this case, I don't think any of them apply, except we need to
define the template versions before non-template versions.
The decision to define BOOST_NO_MEMBER_TEMPLATES and also define
BOOST_MSVC6_MEMBER_TEMPLATES was made at:
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk