From: Gabriel Dos Reis (Gabriel.Dos-Reis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-19 16:02:34
Beman Dawes <beman_at_[hidden]> writes:
| Here is a response to Jesse Jones' query from Mike Miller (the C++
| committee's core language working group chair).
| I'll respond to him suggesting that there is in fact a defect; the readers
| were "knowledgeable" and yet they reached the opposite conclusion.
| Regardless of that, no one else has challenged Mike's answers to the
| questions, so I expect his interpretation is what most of the core working
| group believes.
I do find Mike's answer as reflecting my understanding of the
Standard. Actually, I'm surprised it can be read in a way which might
imply "const int" is not signed :-)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk