Re: [boost] Re: thread monitors

From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-24 16:53:59

Bill Kempf wrote:

 >I think that we
 >all agree that monitors are an important concept (though there are
 >other concepts that may prove more important, such as channels).  I
 >just think we've concluded that with out language support it is a
 >concept relegated to a useage pattern, not a class type unto itself.

Confirming Bill's comment above, several people at the meeting said 
essentially the same thing.

--Beman