RE: [boost] Re: So much for "poor man's partial template speciali zation" :(

From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-26 15:23:46

> > I guess I'm now a tad confused about the utility of call_traits.  I
> > can see how it would help with template classes in some cases, but is
> > there another way to do what was being attempted here with a template
> > function?
> 
> AFAICT, not with an existing compiler. On the other hand, the core working
> group of the committee just fixed the reference-to-reference problem in
> the
> language, so at least a conforming compiler will "soon" handle this case.
> ;-/
Yeah!

Is "typeof()" part of the language? and my current favorite,
template templates for function definitions? (We need it for
specializations of function templates in lambda expressions.)

  -gary-

gary.powell_at_[hidden]