From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-10-26 15:23:46
> > I guess I'm now a tad confused about the utility of call_traits. I
> > can see how it would help with template classes in some cases, but is
> > there another way to do what was being attempted here with a template
> > function?
> AFAICT, not with an existing compiler. On the other hand, the core working
> group of the committee just fixed the reference-to-reference problem in
> language, so at least a conforming compiler will "soon" handle this case.
Is "typeof()" part of the language? and my current favorite,
template templates for function definitions? (We need it for
specializations of function templates in lambda expressions.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk