|
|
Boost : |
From: John Maddock (John_Maddock_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-06 06:36:06
>I would argue that "compile-time assert" is MUCH less confusing.
I personally don't care what it's called, except that last time this was
discussed "static assert" seemed to win out (after a very long argument).
Maybe its time to invoke egroups poll facilities?
- John.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk