RE: [boost] any -> void*

From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-07 15:40:32

> Historically this also turns back the clock a little, as empty was what
> was originally supported, but also raises another question over
> something I removed a while ago: should a clear function be added to
> support the more explicit approach? Ie a.clear() as opposed to a =
> any().
> 
Yes. It's better than a.erase() or a = any(); IMO it reads better.

   Yours,
  -gary-

gary.powell_at_[hidden]