Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Gary Powell (Gary.Powell_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-16 15:46:19

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Previous message: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Maybe in reply to: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"

> It /saves/ lots of space if most of your numbers are near 0, which is
> common.
>
Most of my attempts at data packing generated more code than data savings.
I've pretty much given up on this as an optimization.

-gary-

Next message: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Previous message: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Maybe in reply to: Gary Powell: "RE: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Next in thread: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"
Reply: David Abrahams: "Re: [boost] Portable binary integers [was generic polyvalent I/O]"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk