From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-19 15:29:02
In message <121a01c05265$a99a9a70$37781990_at_[hidden]>, Greg Colvin
>> For function smart pointers, the case is slightly different. For a
>> start, there is a strong and justified expectation that they look and
>> feel like pointers, including -- often -- conversion semantics.
>I didn't think pointer to function converted to pointer to void anyway.
I meant it less specifically: conversion to a pointer that could be used
in a Boolean expression. void * is just one possibility, void (*)() is
Kevlin Henney phone: +44 117 942 2990
Curbralan Limited mobile: +44 7801 073 508
mailto:kevlin_at_[hidden] fax: +44 870 052 2289
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk