Re: [boost] Re: Callbacks Again

From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-11-19 15:29:02

In message <121a01c05265$a99a9a70$37781990_at_[hidden]>, Greg Colvin
<gcolvin_at_[hidden]> writes
>> For function smart pointers, the case is slightly different. For a
>> start, there is a strong and justified expectation that they look and
>> feel like pointers, including -- often -- conversion semantics.
>
>I didn't think pointer to function converted to pointer to void anyway.

I meant it less specifically: conversion to a pointer that could be used
in a Boolean expression. void * is just one possibility, void (*)() is
another, etc.
____________________________________________________________

  Kevlin Henney                   phone:  [phone]
  Curbralan Limited               mobile: [phone]
  mailto:kevlin_at_[hidden]     fax:    [phone]
  http://www.curbralan.com
____________________________________________________________