|
Boost : |
From: Greg Colvin (gcolvin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-12-01 23:11:46
From: Victor A. Wagner, Jr. <vawjr_at_[hidden]>
> how the hell did they manage to screw that up??????
There was no law saying they had to produce human-readable results ;->
> At Friday 00/12/01 12:13, you wrote:
>
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Ed Brey" <brey_at_[hidden]>
> >
> > > I also have a semi-nit: The long list of catches for classes deriving from
> > > std::exception, could be replaced by:
> > > catch ( const std::exception & ex )
> > > { std::cout << typeid(ex).name() << ": " << ex.what() << std::endl; }
> >
> >That's doesn't give you portably readable output. Some compilers (e.g. gcc)
> >don't produce human-readable typeid(T).name() results.
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> Victor A. Wagner, Jr.
> Secretary, Wyoming Libertarian Party
> PGP RSA fingerprint = 4D20 EBF6 0101 B069 3817 8DBF C846 E47A
> PGP D-H fingerprint = 98BC 65E3 1A19 43EC 3908 65B9 F755 E6F4 63BB 9D93
> The five most dangerous words in the English language:
> "There oughta be a law"
>
>
>
>
>
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk