|
Boost : |
From: Kevlin Henney (kevlin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-12-02 04:32:02
In message <20001201193344.3e206c74.gregod_at_[hidden]>, Douglas Gregor
<gregod_at_[hidden]> writes
>My preference would be function_ptr if the callbacks have
>reference semantics, or function_obj if they have cloning semantics ("functor"
>would be my first choice for cloning semantics because it is concise, but it
>appears that it is no longer a usable term).
How about function_adapter?
Kevlin
____________________________________________________________
Kevlin Henney phone: +44 117 942 2990
Curbralan Limited mobile: +44 7801 073 508
mailto:kevlin_at_[hidden] fax: +44 870 052 2289
http://www.curbralan.com
____________________________________________________________
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk