Re: lexical_cast again

From: d.frey_at_[hidden]
Date: 2000-12-04 09:43:31

--- In boost_at_[hidden], Kevlin Henney <kevlin_at_c...> wrote:
> I think all of this seems to suggest retaining the status quo: pass
> by copy rather than pass by const reference. Given that this
> involves no change to the code, I am happy with that :-)

And as the one who suggested using a const reference, I think it would
be nice to include the reasons for pass by copy in the documentation.
Or the same dicussion will start again in several month :)

Regards, Daniel