Date: 2000-12-18 13:33:30
> I know we had a long discussion about the intent of the standard with
> regard to the question "is T* const a pointer"? I think the
> resolution was that, however strict, our previous reading of the
> standard misconstrued its intent and we would change the behavior of
> type_traits appropriately. Did that ever happen, or have I
> misunderstood our conclusion?
type_traits is in the process of being more-or-less totally re-evaluated.
All type-based queries will be cv-insensitive. Also, we're reviewing the
categories provided; some categories like is_standard_* and is_extension_*
will probably be deprecated. None of these changes have been reflected back
into Boost yet.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk