From: Daryle Walker (darylew_at_[hidden])
Date: 2000-12-23 19:35:53
on 12/14/00 11:10 PM, Jens Maurer at Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden] wrote:
> Daryle Walker wrote:
>> I think C++ I/O is neat, so rounded up a bunch of ideas I've thought of and
>> some that I've seen in the newsgroups, and some in C++ books and put them
>> together in a sub-library. I'm going to add a few more headers later.
I just put up version 4 of the More-I/O library, which should address some
of the following thoughts.
> A few random thoughts:
> - The skip() function seems to be undocumented.
I didn't have a 'skip' function. It was a name of the 'char' specialization
of the 'basic_skip' class template. I guess you are thinking that my
manipulator was set up like the ones in the standard library. However, my
new version does use the system you were thinking about. (Add a 'skip'
function which returns objects from 'basic_skipper'.)
> - The memory streams are interesting in the persistence context.
> - In general, the stuff should be split up a little bit better.
I did a couple of splits in the headers.
> The non-persistent stream manipulators may overlap with the
> type-safe printf-like output proposal we had on boost a few months
In what way?
> - Tests should be written for all functions.
Yeah. I don't use C++ I/O that much, besides basic writing/reading, so I
don't know how to make good test cases.
> - more_iomanip.hpp has default template arguments for function
> templates. This is an error in general, and it is not needed here
> because of template argument deduction.
OK. I wonder if I need it for the new 'skip' function template.
> - The header dependency list of more_iomanip.hpp looks slightly
> frightening -> a reason to split it up.
> - basic_skip::istream_type operator>>(...) has a superfluous
> typename in the parameter list.
-- Daryle Walker Mac, Internet, and Video Game Junkie darylew AT mac DOT com
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk