From: Beman Dawes (beman_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-03 11:31:27
At 03:49 PM 1/3/2001 +0000, William Kempf wrote:
>The Boost Thread Library (final name?) is very much a work in
>progress. Things slowed down in the last few months because of the
>holidays and other pressing matters, but I'll be stoking the fires
>again real soon.
>You comments about needing thread safety brings up a topic for
>discussion, however. Early in the development we talked about there
>being a need for synchronization primitives even before we include
>portable thread support. We're basically close enough now to focus
>on porting such primitives to various platforms and submitting an
>initial version of the library to Boost. My focus had moved on to
>TLS and thread support rather than on finishing the synchronization
>primitives, but maybe we should consider doing just this. Any
>thoughts from others on this?
Rather than waiting for a single perfect library, would it move things
along faster if you separated the architecture into two or three sections
(or levels, if that makes more sense), and then finalized a submission for
the most basic?
Aside from technical issues, that would give the impression of progress
with the attendant social engineering benefits.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk