From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-07 09:17:51
From: "Greg Colvin" <greg_at_[hidden]>
> > > Since it seems that hash stuff is useful, maybe we could add
> > > classes to Boost.
> I've never been big on general-purpose hashtables, as a
> tree-based set or map provides the same interface and
> more, and reasonable average and worst case performance,
> whereas a hashtable can have truly terrible worst case
Is this a reason for not giving the user a choice? Given a hash_map, I can
evaluate its performance in the particular situation I'm interested in and
decide whether I want a hash_map or an ordinary map.
In many cases the hash_map wins by an order of magnitude.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk