RE: [boost] Stupid Win32 DLL vs Static question

From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-11 19:02:02

At 10:17 AM 1/11/2001 +0100, Schaible, Joerg wrote:

 >Just see http://www.egroups.com/message/boost/1953
 >
 >Some things pop up again and again <g>

Damn!  Sorry about that, Joerg.

I've just now made the change to config.hpp (for VC++, CodeWarrior, and 
Borland).

What did you do about the warning messages?  (See below.)  I think I'll 
just move the timer, etc., implementation into the headers and be done with 
it.  Slightly poorer encapsulation, but much less aggravation.

--Beman

prg_display.cpp
c:\boost\dev\boost\timer.hpp(53) : warning C4251: '_imp' : class 
'boost::scoped_ptr<class boost::timer::_timer>' needs to have dll-interface 
to be used by clients of class 'boost::timer'

c:\boost\dev\boost\progress.hpp(29) : warning C4275: non dll-interface 
class 'boost::noncopyable' used as base for dll-interface class 
'boost::progress_timer'
         c:\boost\site\boost\utility.hpp(58) : see declaration of 
'noncopyable'

c:\boost\dev\boost\progress.hpp(47) : warning C4275: non dll-interface 
class 'boost::noncopyable' used as base for dll-interface class 
'boost::progress_display'
         c:\boost\site\boost\utility.hpp(58) : see declaration of 
'noncopyable'