From: Peter Dimov (pdimov_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-15 16:52:07
From: "Jens Maurer" <Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden]>
> > template<class T> void f(T const & t);
> > void g();
> > f(g);
> > Is icl 5 right in rejecting this? (a non-const reference works.)
> I believe so. See the thread starting at
> for some more explanation.
Thanks, I remember the thread now. It makes sense.
I tried to switch to pass-by-value:
template<class T> explicit X(T);
template<class T> X & operator= (T);
... and received all kinds of weird results from the compilers. Only g++
2.95.2 works as I expect, preferring the implicit copy constructor and
assignment operator over the template versions.
Back to the drawing board.
-- Peter Dimov Multi Media Ltd.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk