Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-16 12:18:50

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Previous message: Jens Maurer: "Re: [boost] Should we "pervert" next() and prior() for numeric types?"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"

Beman Dawes wrote:
> compiler-status // my favorite (but I don't care all that much)

What about "portability-status"?

It's not just compiler, but library and CPU and OS and ... as well.

(I'm happy with compiler-status as well, though.)

Jens Maurer

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Previous message: Jens Maurer: "Re: [boost] Should we "pervert" next() and prior() for numeric types?"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Next in thread: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"
Reply: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] Regression tests on more platforms?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk