From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-01-17 17:16:37
At 10:27 PM 1/17/2001 +0100, Jens Maurer wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>> "status" sounds good to me. I'm tied up trying to get out a release of
>> some non-boost software.
>> If you want to move things over, that is fine
>> with me. That will fix the screwed-up cs-win32.zip, too.
>Done. I hope I fixed all HTML references.
Thanks. Don't worry about the HTML references; the process I use to update
the web site catches broken intra-site links, and can do global fixes.
>We should reconsider whether and how we want to check in the compile
>Binary files are not storage efficient with CVS's "save the latest
>version in full and incremental text diff's for the older versions".
>For each checked-in binary file, CVS basically stores each version
>in full. 10 check-in's of 20 KB is 200 KB already, and we expect to
>run the regression tests rather often. On the other hand, the
>non-compressed log files are 200-500 KB.
>Is there possibly some non-version controlled place we could put
>the log files and add a link? The log files are only really
>interesting for developers and not for boost users, because the
>error messages of the compilers usually require an advanced
>understanding of the inner workings of the boost libraries.
SourceForge has an FTP facility we are not using now. How about
that? (But I don't know if it is possible to link to it.) Otherwise we
can set up a dummy eGroups mailing list with the developers having write
access, with the Files section open to the public.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk