From: Beman Dawes (bdawes_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-01 10:09:55
At 08:42 PM 1/31/2001 -0700, John (EBo) David wrote:
>Possibly a couple of other test types we could consider:
> "expect value less than"
> "expect value greater than"
> "expect value in range"
The challenge is to produce a pretty-good-expect that is easily portable,
no dependencies on anything except the standard library, small (a few
hundred lines of code, maximum), and very easy to configure. In other
words, trouble-free for the boost developers who are the users.
A simple file comparison program would often meet those needs, but wouldn't
do for "expect value less than" etc.
Maybe someone familiar with dejagnu could comment. Is there a subset that
would suit boost's needs?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk