Re: [boost] Re: Using ggcl with Sun CC-6.0 (Forte)

From: Jens Maurer (Jens.Maurer_at_[hidden])
Date: 2001-02-02 13:57:07

mishkin_at_[hidden] wrote:
> - BOOST_NO_STD_ITERATOR_TRAITS
> - BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
> - BOOST_NO_HASH
> - BOOST_NO_SLIST
> 
> I came up with this list by more or less by looking at compilation
> errors and adding -D's that looked promising.

Thanks.  I'm reluctant to add BOOST_NO_TEMPLATE_PARTIAL_SPECIALIZATION
for now because I've been unable to reproduce this on a small testcase.
The others are there now.

> If people want to offer opinions about the relative virtues of g++
> vs. the Sun compiler, I'd be happy to hear them.

As can be seen on the regression test page (Beman posted the URL),
graph.cpp works on Solaris with gcc 2.95.2.

So, for the moment, gcc seems to be the compiler of choice if you
don't want to buy KAI C++.

Jens Maurer